| |||||||||||||||
|
Home
Cover Story Table of Contents E-Newsletter Article Archive Editorial Calendar Datebook Writers' Guidelines Orgs/Links Opinion Polls Reprints Forum Search ![]() ![]() |
The June issue of the Journal of the American College of Radiology examines the utilization of abdominal imaging in recent years by comparing Medicare Part B data from both radiologists and nonradiologist physicians. The data indicates a moderate increase in utilization with radiologists strongly predominating in abdominal imaging interpretation, which supports the idea that imaging utilization can remain under control if there are fewer opportunities for self-referral. In “Recent Trends in Utilization Rates of Abdominal Imaging: The Relative Roles of Radiologists and Nonradiologist Physicians,” authors David C. Levin, MD, et al., suggest this modest increase in the utilization rate of abdominal imaging—25%—is due to the widespread use of advanced imaging modalities, such as CT and CT angiography. While the utilization of these modalities increased by a margin of 141%, this number was offset by the decreased usage of other modalities such as plain radiography. “Radiation Safety in the Era of Helical Computed Tomography,” by Steven Birnbaum, MD, outlines a process for initiating a comprehensive, patient-based radiation safety program achievable in a community hospital setting. With the help of radiologists and CT technologists, the author explains how all healthcare personnel can be educated in safety in regards to the performance of CT scans and work to minimize patient exposure by using shields, avoiding multiphase studies when applicable, and other important technical factors. In the United States, 38% to 65% of patients with early
stage breast cancer undergo breast conservation therapy (BCT). A panel
convened to create up-to-date-guidelines for the appropriate use of
radiation for BCT and “American College of Radiology Appropriateness
Criteria: Conservative Surgery and Radiation: Stages I and II Breast
Carcinoma,” by Julia R. White, MD, et al., is the result of this
panel’s discussions on a variety of clinical scenarios, including
node-positive breast cancer, elderly patients, genetic breast cancer,
and partial breast irradiation. The guidelines set forth in this article,
as are all of the ACR’s guidelines, are intended to aid physicians
in determining the appropriate imaging examination for specific medical
conditions. The panel used a modified Delphi technique to reach a consensus,
which involved drawing conclusions from nine clinical studies addressing
important aspects of breast conservation. Source: American College of Radiology
|
|
3801 Schuylkill Rd • Spring City, PA 19475 Publishers of Radiology Today All rights reserved. |